WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#32: 
new file mode 100644

WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
#48: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:12:
+	return bpf_map_create(map_type, map_name, key_size, value_size, max_entries, NULL);

WARNING: line length of 95 exceeds 80 columns
#51: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:15:
+static int prog_load(struct bpf_insn *insns, __u32 insn_cnt, int *fd_array, __u32 fd_array_cnt)

WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns
#58: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:22:
+	return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, NULL, "GPL", insns, insn_cnt, &opts);

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#86: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:50:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#98: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:62:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns
#132: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:96:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 101 exceeds 80 columns
#140: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:104:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "program should have been rejected (prog_fd != -EINVAL)")) {

WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns
#168: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:132:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 101 exceeds 80 columns
#176: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:140:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "program should have been rejected (prog_fd != -EINVAL)")) {

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#231: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:195:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
#234: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:198:
+		ASSERT_EQ(val.xlated_off, map_out[i], "val should be equal map_out[i]");

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#282: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:246:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
#285: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:249:
+		ASSERT_EQ(val.xlated_off, map_out[i], "val should be equal map_out[i]");

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#333: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:297:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
#336: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:300:
+		ASSERT_EQ(val.xlated_off, map_out[i], "val should be equal map_out[i]");

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#361: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:325:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#367: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:331:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "program should have been rejected (prog_fd != -EINVAL)"))

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#380: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:344:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#408: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:372:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#420: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:384:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#428: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:392:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(extra_fd, -EBUSY, "program should have been rejected (extra_fd != -EBUSY)"))

WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
#449: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:413:
+		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#466: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_set.c:430:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "program should have been rejected (prog_fd != -EINVAL)"))

total: 0 errors, 24 warnings, 0 checks, 481 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit 3968fe5a9c6e ("selftests/bpf: add selftests for new insn_set map") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT BAD_REPORTED_BY_LINK CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
total: 0 errors, 24 warnings, 0 checks, 481 lines checked