../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4143:43: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4143:43: struct xfrm_policy_afinfo const [noderef] __rcu * ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4143:43: struct xfrm_policy_afinfo const * ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4229:29: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4229:29: expected struct hlist_head [noderef] __rcu *table ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4229:29: got struct hlist_head * ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4256:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4256:36: expected struct hlist_head *n ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4256:36: got struct hlist_head [noderef] __rcu *table ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4282:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4282:17: expected struct hlist_head const *h ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4282:17: got struct hlist_head [noderef] __rcu *table ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4283:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4283:36: expected struct hlist_head *n ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:4283:36: got struct hlist_head [noderef] __rcu *table ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:264:9: warning: context imbalance in 'xfrm_policy_get_afinfo' - different lock contexts for basic block ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in '__xfrm_dst_lookup' - unexpected unlock ../net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh ../net/core/filter.c:3931:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:4663:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:5077:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:8014:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:11973:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:11989:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12005:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12026:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12123:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12245:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: expected unsigned long long ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:575:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_perf_event_read_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:885:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:897:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_thread_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1188:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3424:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3432:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3613:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3625:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3622:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3629:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3639:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3636:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3643:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3653:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3650:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3660:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3657:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3668:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3664:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3676:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3672:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2514:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2518:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:575:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_perf_event_read_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:885:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:897:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_thread_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1188:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3424:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3432:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3609:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3621:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3618:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3625:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3635:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3632:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3639:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3649:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3646:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3656:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3653:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3664:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3660:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3672:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3668:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2514:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2518:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:575:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_perf_event_read_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:885:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:897:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_thread_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1188:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3424:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3432:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3613:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3625:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3622:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3629:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3639:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3636:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3643:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3653:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3650:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3660:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3657:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3668:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3664:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3676:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3672:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2514:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2518:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?