../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
../net/core/filter.c:1431:39:    expected struct sock_filter const *filter
../net/core/filter.c:1431:39:    got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
../net/core/filter.c:1509:39:    expected struct sock_filter const *filter
../net/core/filter.c:1509:39:    got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:2331:45:    expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
../net/core/filter.c:2331:45:    got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh
../net/core/filter.c:3931:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:4663:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:5077:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:8014:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:11987:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:12003:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:12019:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:12040:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:12137:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:12259:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1939:43:    expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
../net/core/filter.c:1939:43:    got unsigned long long [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1942:36:    expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old
../net/core/filter.c:1942:36:    got unsigned long long [usertype] from
../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1942:42:    expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new
../net/core/filter.c:1942:42:    got unsigned long long [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1945:36:    expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
../net/core/filter.c:1945:36:    got unsigned long long [usertype] from
../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1945:42:    expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1945:42:    got unsigned long long [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1990:59:    expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
../net/core/filter.c:1990:59:    got unsigned long long [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1993:52:    expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from
../net/core/filter.c:1993:52:    got unsigned long long [usertype] from
../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1993:58:    expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1993:58:    got unsigned long long [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1996:52:    expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
../net/core/filter.c:1996:52:    got unsigned long long [usertype] from
../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:1996:58:    expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:1996:58:    got unsigned long long [usertype] to
../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:2063:35:    expected unsigned long long
../net/core/filter.c:2063:35:    got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum
../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:5934:17:    expected unsigned int [usertype] spi
../net/core/filter.c:5934:17:    got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi
../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
../net/core/filter.c:5942:33:    expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4
../net/core/filter.c:5942:33:    got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4
../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:41:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static?
../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:57:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static?
../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:81:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static?
../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:129:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static?
../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:162:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static?
../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:288:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_set_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static?
../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:314:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_remove_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/core.c:243:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions
../kernel/bpf/core.c:2961:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h):
../include/trace/events/xdp.h:321:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../include/trace/events/xdp.h:348:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../include/trace/events/xdp.h:382:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h):
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu *
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node *
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu *
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node *
../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:348:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22375:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h):
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar
../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h):
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar
../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar
../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:521:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test1' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:527:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test2' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:532:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test3' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:537:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test4' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:542:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test5' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:547:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test6' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:556:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test7' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:562:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test8' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:567:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test9' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:572:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test10' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:577:15: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test_sinfo' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:581:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:587:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test2' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:594:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test_tp' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:601:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_shadow_test' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:623:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_test_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:628:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_test_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:634:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:638:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  378 |         ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  434 |         ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  476 |         seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41:    expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41:    got void *
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3466:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3474:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3515:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2558:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2562:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h):
../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock
../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:521:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test1' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:527:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test2' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:532:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test3' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:537:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test4' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:542:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test5' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:547:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test6' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:556:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test7' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:562:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test8' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:567:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test9' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:572:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test10' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:577:15: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test_sinfo' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:581:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:587:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test2' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:594:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test_tp' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:601:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_shadow_test' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:623:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_test_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:628:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_test_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:634:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:638:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  378 |         ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  434 |         ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  476 |         seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41:    expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41:    got void *
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3455:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3463:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3504:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2547:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2551:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h):
../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock
../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:521:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test1' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:527:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test2' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:532:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test3' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:537:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test4' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:542:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test5' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:547:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test6' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:556:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test7' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:562:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test8' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:567:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test9' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:572:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test10' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:577:15: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_test_sinfo' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:581:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:587:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test2' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:594:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_modify_return_test_tp' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:601:14: warning: symbol 'bpf_fentry_shadow_test' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:623:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_test_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:628:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_test_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:634:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
../net/bpf/test_run.c:638:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  378 |         ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  434 |         ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’:
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
  476 |         seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41:    expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41:    got void *
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3466:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3474:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3515:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2558:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2562:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression
../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h):
../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock
../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?