========== build_allmodconfig_warn - FAILED ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh ../net/core/filter.c:3931:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:4663:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:5077:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:8014:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:11987:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12003:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12019:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12040:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12137:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12259:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: expected unsigned long long ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:41:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:57:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:81:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:129:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:162:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:288:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_set_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:314:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_remove_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ At top level: cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics ../kernel/bpf/core.c:243:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions ../kernel/bpf/core.c:2961:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:321:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:348:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:382:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3455:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3463:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3504:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2547:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2551:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:348:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22381:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:41:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:57:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:81:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:129:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:162:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:288:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_set_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:314:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_remove_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/core.c:243:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions ../kernel/bpf/core.c:2961:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:321:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:348:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:382:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ At top level: cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3455:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3463:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3504:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2547:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2551:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1431:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1509:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr ../net/core/filter.c:2331:45: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh ../net/core/filter.c:3931:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:4663:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:5077:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:8014:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:11987:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12003:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12019:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12040:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12137:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12259:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1939:43: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old ../net/core/filter.c:1942:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new ../net/core/filter.c:1942:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1945:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1945:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1990:59: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1993:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1993:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1996:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1996:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: expected unsigned long long ../net/core/filter.c:2063:35: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5934:17: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 ../net/core/filter.c:5942:33: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘mark_all_regs_read_and_precise’: ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18238:13: warning: variable ‘insn_idx’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 18238 | u32 insn_idx; | ^~~~~~~~ At top level: cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:348:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22376:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? New errors added --- /tmp/tmp.0u8opyqsNm 2025-04-26 04:45:02.912176649 -0700 +++ /tmp/tmp.icUCC7w2XN 2025-04-26 04:47:09.210319155 -0700 @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:41:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static? +../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:57:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static? +../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:81:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static? +../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:129:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? +../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:162:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? +../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:288:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_set_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? +../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:314:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_remove_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/bpf/core.c:243:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions +../kernel/bpf/core.c:2961:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): +../include/trace/events/xdp.h:321:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer +../include/trace/events/xdp.h:348:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer +../include/trace/events/xdp.h:382:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer +../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] + 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); + | ^~~ +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] + 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); + | ^~~ +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] + 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +At top level: +cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3455:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3463:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3504:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2547:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2551:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): +../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock +../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): +../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar +../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar @@ -59,19 +118,4 @@ -../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:41:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static? -../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:57:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static? -../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:81:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static? -../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:129:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? -../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:162:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? -../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:288:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_set_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? -../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:314:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_remove_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] - 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); - | ^~~ -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] - 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); - | ^~~ -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] - 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); - | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘mark_all_regs_read_and_precise’: +../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18238:13: warning: variable ‘insn_idx’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] +18238 | u32 insn_idx; + | ^~~~~~~~ @@ -80,34 +123,0 @@ -../kernel/bpf/core.c:243:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions -../kernel/bpf/core.c:2961:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): -../include/trace/events/xdp.h:321:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer -../include/trace/events/xdp.h:348:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer -../include/trace/events/xdp.h:382:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer -../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3455:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3463:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3504:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2547:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2551:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): -../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock @@ -115 +125 @@ -../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22381:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs +../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22376:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs @@ -125,4 +134,0 @@ -../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): -../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar -../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar -../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? Per-file breakdown --- /tmp/tmp.H9Qnz8InR7 2025-04-26 04:47:09.218987455 -0700 +++ /tmp/tmp.HNsQuP63UY 2025-04-26 04:47:09.221987427 -0700 @@ -8 +8 @@ - 2 ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c + 3 ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c