../net/sched/sch_generic.c:222:9: warning: context imbalance in 'try_bulk_dequeue_skb_slow' - different lock contexts for basic block ../net/sched/sch_generic.c:302:28: warning: context imbalance in 'dequeue_skb' - different lock contexts for basic block ../net/sched/sch_generic.c:324:28: warning: context imbalance in 'sch_direct_xmit' - unexpected unlock ../net/sched/sch_generic.c:466:6: warning: context imbalance in 'netif_tx_lock' - wrong count at exit ../net/sched/sch_generic.c:489:6: warning: context imbalance in 'netif_tx_unlock' - unexpected unlock ../net/sched/sch_generic.c:1294:13: warning: context imbalance in 'dev_reset_queue' - different lock contexts for basic block ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ At top level: cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3455:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3463:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3504:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2547:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2551:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ At top level: cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3527:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3535:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3576:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2619:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2623:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ At top level: cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:787:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:835:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1273:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1322:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1346:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1366:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3455:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3463:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3504:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2547:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2551:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?