../kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1457:27: warning: context imbalance in 'htab_map_delete_elem' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1494:27: warning: context imbalance in 'htab_lru_map_delete_elem' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1668:27: warning: context imbalance in '__htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/hashtab.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/workqueue.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in '__htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_hash_map_seq_find_next' - unexpected unlock ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_hash_map_seq_stop' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:756:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:767:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:782:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:830:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:830:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:830:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1281:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1330:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1354:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1374:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3527:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3535:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3576:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2628:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2632:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:755:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:766:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:781:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:829:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:829:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:829:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1280:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1329:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1353:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1373:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3526:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3534:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3575:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2627:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2631:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:756:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:767:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:782:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:830:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:830:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:830:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1281:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1330:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1354:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1374:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3527:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3535:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3576:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2628:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2632:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:880:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?