WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#24: 
new file mode 100644

WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
#40: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:12:
+	return bpf_map_create(map_type, map_name, key_size, value_size, max_entries, NULL);

WARNING: line length of 95 exceeds 80 columns
#43: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:15:
+static int prog_load(struct bpf_insn *insns, __u32 insn_cnt, int *fd_array, __u32 fd_array_cnt)

WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns
#50: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:22:
+	return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, NULL, "GPL", insns, insn_cnt, &opts);

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#78: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:50:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#87: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:59:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns
#121: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:93:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 101 exceeds 80 columns
#126: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:98:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "program should have been rejected (prog_fd != -EINVAL)")) {

WARNING: line length of 93 exceeds 80 columns
#154: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:126:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 101 exceeds 80 columns
#159: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:131:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "program should have been rejected (prog_fd != -EINVAL)")) {

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#211: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:183:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
#214: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:186:
+		ASSERT_EQ(val.xlated_off, map_out[i], "val should be equal map_out[i]");

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#259: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:231:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
#262: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:234:
+		ASSERT_EQ(val.xlated_off, map_out[i], "val should be equal map_out[i]");

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#307: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:279:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns
#310: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:282:
+		ASSERT_EQ(val.xlated_off, map_out[i], "val should be equal map_out[i]");

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#335: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:307:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &val, 0), 0, "bpf_map_update_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
#344: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:316:
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &i, &val), 0, "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#352: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:324:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(extra_fd, -EBUSY, "program should have been rejected (extra_fd != -EBUSY)"))

WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
#373: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:345:
+		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),

WARNING: line length of 99 exceeds 80 columns
#386: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_insn_array.c:358:
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_fd, -EINVAL, "program should have been rejected (prog_fd != -EINVAL)"))

total: 0 errors, 21 warnings, 0 checks, 405 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit ebcf68ced6e9 ("selftests/bpf: add selftests for new insn_array map") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT BAD_REPORTED_BY_LINK CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
total: 0 errors, 21 warnings, 0 checks, 405 lines checked