========== build_allmodconfig_warn - FAILED ../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr ../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh ../net/core/filter.c:3949:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:4681:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:5095:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:8032:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12004:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12037:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb_meta' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12056:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12072:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12093:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12190:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12323:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old ../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new ../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: expected unsigned long long ../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum ../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 ../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c: In function ‘____bpf_snprintf’: ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1066:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_snprintf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 1066 | err = bstr_printf(str, str_size, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:42:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:58:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:82:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:130:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:163:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:289:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_set_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:315:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_remove_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:339:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_read_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/core.c:248:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions ../kernel/bpf/core.c:2966:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:304:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:331:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1196:21: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1196:21: expected unsigned long long ( *[usertype] callback_fn )( ... ) ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1196:21: got void [noderef] __rcu * ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1908:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1909:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1910:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1911:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1912:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1913:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1914:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1915:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_perf_event_read_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1916:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1917:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_thread_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1920:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2180:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_obj_new_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2194:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2225:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_obj_drop_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2233:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2239:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_refcount_acquire_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2284:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_push_front_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2294:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_push_back_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2327:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_pop_front' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2332:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_pop_back' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2337:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_front' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2347:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_back' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2357:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_remove' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2413:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_add_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2423:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_first' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2430:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_root' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2437:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_left' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2447:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_right' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2463:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_acquire' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2474:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_release' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2479:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2492:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_acquire' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2504:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_release' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2509:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2522:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_ancestor' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2542:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_from_id' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2562:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_under_cgroup' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2605:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_get_cgroup1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2622:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_from_pid' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2641:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_from_vpid' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2682:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_slice' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2802:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_adjust' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2821:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_is_null' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2828:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2838:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_size' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2848:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_clone' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2875:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_copy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2930:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_memset' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2965:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2970:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_rdonly_cast' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2975:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_rcu_read_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2980:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_rcu_read_unlock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3016:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_throw' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3035:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_wq_init' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3049:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_wq_start' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3066:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_wq_set_callback_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3080:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_preempt_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3085:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_preempt_enable' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3144:1: warning: symbol 'bpf_iter_bits_new' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3205:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_iter_bits_next' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3231:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_iter_bits_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3255:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_str' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3300:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3330:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_local_irq_save' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3335:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_local_irq_restore' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3340:18: warning: symbol '__bpf_trap' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3395:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strcmp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3413:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strcasecmp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3434:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strnchr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3471:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strchr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3488:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strchrnul' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3520:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strrchr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3553:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strnlen' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3583:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strlen' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3601:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strspn' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3645:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strcspn' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3690:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strnstr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3736:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strstr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2975:18: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_rcu_read_lock' - wrong count at exit ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/workqueue.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_rcu_read_unlock' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:575:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_perf_event_read_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:786:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:834:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:834:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:834:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:884:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:896:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_thread_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1187:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1272:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1321:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1345:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1365:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3497:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3505:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3686:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3698:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3695:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3702:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3712:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3709:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3716:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3726:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3723:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3733:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3730:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3741:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3737:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3749:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3745:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2512:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2516:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:355:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22666:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:42:25: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_task_exe_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:58:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_put_file' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:82:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_path_d_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:130:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:163:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_file_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:289:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_set_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:315:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_remove_dentry_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c:339:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_read_xattr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c: In function ‘bpf_insn_successors’: ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[149]’) 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[150]’) 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[5]’) 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[6]’) 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[21]’) 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[22]’) 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[85]’) 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[86]’) 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[165]’) 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[166]’) 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[181]’) 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[182]’) 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[37]’) 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[38]’) 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[53]’) 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[54]’) 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[101]’) 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[102]’) 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[117]’) 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[118]’) 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[197]’) 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[198]’) 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[213]’) 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[214]’) 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[229]’) 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[230]’) 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[69]’) 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[70]’) 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), | ^ ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c: In function ‘____bpf_snprintf’: ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1066:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_snprintf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 1066 | err = bstr_printf(str, str_size, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1196:21: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1196:21: expected unsigned long long ( *[usertype] callback_fn )( ... ) ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1196:21: got void [noderef] __rcu * ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1908:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1909:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1910:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1911:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1912:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1913:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1914:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1915:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_perf_event_read_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1916:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1917:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_thread_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1920:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2180:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_obj_new_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2194:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2225:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_obj_drop_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2233:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2239:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_refcount_acquire_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2284:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_push_front_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2294:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_push_back_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2327:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_pop_front' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2332:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_pop_back' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2337:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_front' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2347:34: warning: symbol 'bpf_list_back' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2357:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_remove' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2413:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_add_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2423:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_first' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2430:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_root' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2437:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_left' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2447:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_rbtree_right' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2463:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_acquire' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2474:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_release' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2479:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2492:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_acquire' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2504:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_release' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2509:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_release_dtor' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2522:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_ancestor' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2542:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_cgroup_from_id' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2562:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_under_cgroup' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2605:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_get_cgroup1' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2622:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_from_pid' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2641:32: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_from_vpid' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2682:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_slice' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2802:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_adjust' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2821:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_is_null' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2828:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2838:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_size' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2848:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_clone' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2875:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_copy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2930:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_memset' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2965:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2970:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_rdonly_cast' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2975:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_rcu_read_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2980:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_rcu_read_unlock' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3016:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_throw' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3035:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_wq_init' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3049:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_wq_start' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3066:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_wq_set_callback_impl' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3080:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_preempt_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3085:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_preempt_enable' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3144:1: warning: symbol 'bpf_iter_bits_new' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3205:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_iter_bits_next' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3231:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_iter_bits_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3255:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_str' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3300:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3330:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_local_irq_save' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3335:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_local_irq_restore' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3340:18: warning: symbol '__bpf_trap' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3395:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strcmp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3413:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strcasecmp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3434:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strnchr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3471:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strchr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3488:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strchrnul' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3520:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strrchr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3553:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strnlen' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3583:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strlen' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3601:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strspn' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3645:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strcspn' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3690:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strnstr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:3736:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_strstr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2975:18: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_rcu_read_lock' - wrong count at exit ../kernel/bpf/helpers.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/workqueue.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'bpf_rcu_read_unlock' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/core.c:248:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions ../kernel/bpf/core.c:2966:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:304:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../include/trace/events/xdp.h:331:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * ../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:190:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:227:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:242:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:277:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:575:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_perf_event_read_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:761:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:772:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:786:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_task_pt_regs_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:834:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:834:41: expected void [noderef] __user *[addressable] [assigned] [usertype] sival_ptr ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:834:41: got void * ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:884:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:896:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_thread_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1187:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1272:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_user_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1321:28: warning: symbol 'bpf_lookup_system_key' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1345:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_key_put' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1365:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3497:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_is_return' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3505:19: warning: symbol 'bpf_session_cookie' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3686:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_send_signal_task' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3698:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3695:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3702:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3712:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3709:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3716:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_probe_read_kernel_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3726:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3723:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3733:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3730:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3741:52: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3737:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3749:56: warning: cast removes address space '__user' of expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:3745:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2512:21: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2516:66: warning: dereference of noderef expression ../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree.h, ../include/linux/mm_types.h, ../include/linux/mmzone.h, ../include/linux/gfp.h, ../include/linux/slab.h): ../include/linux/rcupdate.h:871:25: warning: context imbalance in 'uprobe_prog_run' - unexpected unlock ../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) ../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter ../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter ../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr ../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh ../net/core/filter.c:3949:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:4681:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:5095:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:8032:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12004:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12037:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb_meta' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12056:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12072:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12093:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12190:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:12323:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? ../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old ../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new ../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff ../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from ../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to ../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: expected unsigned long long ../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum ../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi ../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 ../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:355:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22657:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs ../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast to non-scalar ../include/linux/bpfptr.h:65:40: warning: cast from non-scalar ../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static? New errors added --- /tmp/tmp.9uKJnZZ8G8 2025-09-10 21:47:34.829667197 -0700 +++ /tmp/tmp.b4ajKhyZJq 2025-09-10 21:51:53.932559376 -0700 @@ -1,75 +0,0 @@ -../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) -../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter -../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter -../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) -../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter -../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter -../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr -../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh -../net/core/filter.c:3949:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:4681:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:5095:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:8032:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:12004:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:12037:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb_meta' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:12056:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:12072:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:12093:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:12190:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:12323:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? -../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff -../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: got unsigned long long [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old -../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from -../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new -../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from -../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from -../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff -../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: got unsigned long long [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from -../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from -../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from -../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from -../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to -../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: expected unsigned long long -../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum -../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi -../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi -../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) -../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 -../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] - 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); - | ^~~ -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] - 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); - | ^~~ -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: -../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] - 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); - | ^~~~~~~~~~~ -../kernel/bpf/helpers.c: In function ‘____bpf_snprintf’: -../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1066:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_snprintf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] - 1066 | err = bstr_printf(str, str_size, fmt, data.bin_args); - | ^~~ @@ -84,12 +9,342 @@ -../kernel/bpf/core.c:248:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions -../kernel/bpf/core.c:2966:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): -../include/trace/events/xdp.h:304:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer -../include/trace/events/xdp.h:331:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer -../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * -../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c: In function ‘bpf_insn_successors’: +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[149]’) + 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:451:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[150]’) + 451 | _J(BPF_EXIT, {.can_jump = false, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[5]’) + 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:452:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[6]’) + 452 | _J(BPF_JA, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = false}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[21]’) + 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:453:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[22]’) + 453 | _J(BPF_JEQ, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[85]’) + 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:454:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[86]’) + 454 | _J(BPF_JNE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[165]’) + 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:455:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[166]’) + 455 | _J(BPF_JLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[181]’) + 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:456:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[182]’) + 456 | _J(BPF_JLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[37]’) + 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:457:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[38]’) + 457 | _J(BPF_JGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[53]’) + 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:458:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[54]’) + 458 | _J(BPF_JGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[101]’) + 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:459:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[102]’) + 459 | _J(BPF_JSGT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[117]’) + 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:460:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[118]’) + 460 | _J(BPF_JSGE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[197]’) + 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:461:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[198]’) + 461 | _J(BPF_JSLT, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[213]’) + 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:462:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[214]’) + 462 | _J(BPF_JSLE, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[229]’) + 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:463:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[230]’) + 463 | _J(BPF_JCOND, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[69]’) + 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:448:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 448 | [BPF_JMP | code] = __VA_ARGS__, \ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init] + 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:464:31: note: (near initialization for ‘opcode_info_tbl[70]’) + 464 | _J(BPF_JSET, {.can_jump = true, .can_fallthrough = true}), + | ^ +../kernel/bpf/liveness.c:449:38: note: in definition of macro ‘_J’ + 449 | [BPF_JMP32 | code] = __VA_ARGS__ + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ +../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/bpf/helpers.c: In function ‘____bpf_snprintf’: +../kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1066:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_snprintf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] + 1066 | err = bstr_printf(str, str_size, fmt, data.bin_args); + | ^~~ @@ -179,0 +435,24 @@ +../kernel/bpf/core.c:248:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions +../kernel/bpf/core.c:2966:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h): +../include/trace/events/xdp.h:304:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer +../include/trace/events/xdp.h:331:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer +../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h): +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu * +../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: struct rb_node * +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’: +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:378:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_printk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] + 378 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); + | ^~~ +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’: +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:434:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_trace_vprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] + 434 | ret = bstr_printf(data.buf, MAX_BPRINTF_BUF, fmt, data.bin_args); + | ^~~ +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’: +../kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:476:9: warning: function ‘____bpf_seq_printf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] + 476 | seq_bprintf(m, fmt, data.bin_args); + | ^~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -219,3 +498 @@ -../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:355:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? -../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22666:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs -../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): +../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): @@ -223,0 +501,62 @@ +../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) +../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter +../net/core/filter.c:1440:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter +../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) +../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: expected struct sock_filter const *filter +../net/core/filter.c:1518:39: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter +../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr +../net/core/filter.c:2341:45: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh +../net/core/filter.c:3949:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_trace_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:4681:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_skb_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:5095:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_xdp_output_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:8032:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_storage_get_cg_sock_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:12004:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:12037:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb_meta' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:12056:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:12072:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:12093:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:12190:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:12323:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_sock_destroy' was not declared. Should it be static? +../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff +../net/core/filter.c:1948:43: got unsigned long long [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old +../net/core/filter.c:1951:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from +../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new +../net/core/filter.c:1951:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from +../net/core/filter.c:1954:36: got unsigned long long [usertype] from +../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:1954:42: got unsigned long long [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff +../net/core/filter.c:2000:59: got unsigned long long [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from +../net/core/filter.c:2003:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from +../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:2003:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from +../net/core/filter.c:2006:52: got unsigned long long [usertype] from +../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:2006:58: got unsigned long long [usertype] to +../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: expected unsigned long long +../net/core/filter.c:2073:35: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum +../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: expected unsigned int [usertype] spi +../net/core/filter.c:5952:17: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] spi +../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) +../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: expected unsigned int [usertype] remote_ipv4 +../net/core/filter.c:5960:33: got restricted __be32 const [usertype] a4 +../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:355:12: warning: symbol 'btf_vmlinux' was not declared. Should it be static? +../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22657:38: error: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs +../kernel/bpf/verifier.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h): @@ -230 +568,0 @@ -../kernel/bpf/btf.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/bpf_verifier.h): @@ -233 +570,0 @@ -../kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:582:27: warning: symbol 'bpf_struct_ops_link_lops' was not declared. Should it be static? Per-file breakdown --- /tmp/tmp.5wVDOvCbcS 2025-09-10 21:51:53.980610692 -0700 +++ /tmp/tmp.6DWfvKf8p9 2025-09-10 21:51:54.009610448 -0700 @@ -8,0 +9 @@ + 28 ../kernel/bpf/liveness.c