../kernel/bpf/core.c:247:49: error: arithmetics on pointers to functions
../kernel/bpf/core.c:2998:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_seq_printf_btf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/trace/trace_events.h, ../include/trace/define_trace.h, ../include/trace/events/xdp.h, ../include/linux/bpf_trace.h):
../include/trace/events/xdp.h:304:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../include/trace/events/xdp.h:331:1: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/rbtree_latch.h, ../include/linux/bpf.h, ../include/linux/filter.h):
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu *
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node *
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node [noderef] __rcu *
../include/linux/rbtree.h:74:9:    struct rb_node *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:690:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:707:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:713:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:732:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore' was not declared. Should it be static?
../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
../drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c:229:9: warning: context imbalance in 'free_fw_priv' - wrong count at exit
../kernel/sys.c:1144:32: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
../kernel/sys.c:1144:32:    expected struct task_struct *p1
../kernel/sys.c:1144:32:    got struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *real_parent
../kernel/sys.c:1894:33: warning: context imbalance in 'getrusage' - different lock contexts for basic block
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:690:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:707:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:713:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:732:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm.o: warning: objtool: submit_lock_objects+0x44d: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.c: note: in included file (through ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h, ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h, ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.h):
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:434:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/sys.c:1144:32: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
../kernel/sys.c:1144:32:    expected struct task_struct *p1
../kernel/sys.c:1144:32:    got struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *real_parent
../kernel/sys.c:1894:33: warning: context imbalance in 'getrusage' - different lock contexts for basic block
../drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c:229:9: warning: context imbalance in 'free_fw_priv' - wrong count at exit
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:102:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:124:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:137:51:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:671:39:    got struct rqspinlock_held *
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:690:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:707:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:713:17: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave' was not declared. Should it be static?
../kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:732:18: warning: symbol 'bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm.o: warning: objtool: submit_lock_objects+0x44d: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.c: note: in included file (through ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h, ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h, ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.h):
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:434:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
../arch/x86/boot/version.c:18:12: warning: symbol 'kernel_version' was not declared. Should it be static?